── Platform · Performance ──
True performance. Every position, one standard.
True MOICs and IRRs across entities, public and private positions — simple, price, and time weighted returns — benchmarked and attributed the same way.
Not measured differently by account type. One methodology, applied to everything you own.
── Analytics ──
The place where the numbers live.
Returns, benchmarks, vintage context, allocation and geographic exposure — read from one unified data model, so every figure is comparable to every other.
i.
Returns & attribution — public and private, measured the same way.
Most platforms calculate returns on public positions and either bolt on a separate method for private ones — or can't measure them at all. Annise runs one methodology across everything: simple, time- and dollar-weighted returns, MOICs and IRRs, side by side.
Analyze across asset managers, and within a manager down to each of their funds — Fund II compared with Fund III, or Manager A compared with Manager B. Which GP relationships are actually performing is a question you can answer directly.
Returns can be read three ways — simple, price, or time-weighted. Time-weighted return strips out both income and the timing of your own contributions and withdrawals, which is precisely what makes comparing one manager to another, or a manager to a benchmark, a fair comparison at all.
ii.
Benchmarks, and the Alpha they produce.
Relevant indices and comparables sit next to your own return — not behind a separate lookup. Alpha is the return above the benchmark, measured over the same period, on the same basis.
It runs down to the fund, too — a fund's Alpha against its own relevant benchmark, which is what reveals whether a specific GP is adding value rather than riding a market.
iii.
A private fund, judged against its own vintage.
Capital deployed in 2019 met a different market than capital deployed in 2023. So a private fund's IRR only means something next to the funds raised the same year — its actual peer cohort, not the portfolio average.
The Portfolio Agent's Look-Through Lens places each holding in its vintage cohort and reports the quartile. Not “what did this return,” but “what did this return compared to everything else that started when it did.”
iv.
Allocation and diversification, together.
Composition across asset classes and entities, with concentration surfaced in the same place. Where you're weighted, and where a single position carries more of the portfolio than it should.
One module — not a separate allocation view and a separate diversification report to reconcile.
v.
Asset classes, benchmarks and alpha.
Every asset class is measured against the benchmark that belongs to it — public equity against a global index, fixed income against an aggregate, private equity against its own vintage cohort. One blended benchmark across a complex portfolio tells you almost nothing.
What's left after the benchmark is alpha: the return that came from decisions rather than from the market. Annise isolates it per asset class, so you can see which sleeves are earning their fees and which are simply tracking.
Set a custom benchmark where a standard index doesn't fit — a policy target, a blended composite, or a hurdle rate you've agreed with a manager.
vi.
Where your wealth actually sits.
A clear read on geographic exposure — country and region — across every holding. This is the map itself: where you're concentrated, and where you're not.
── Reporting ──
Statements, generated — not assembled.
Balance sheet, income statement, cash flow — produced directly from your system of record, not rebuilt in a spreadsheet after the fact.
Most families and advisors build these by hand, weeks after quarter-close. Annise generates them the moment the data lands — every statement traceable to the same unified model. Download to CSV or print a PDF.
“Your ownership isn't a single line. Your software shouldn't pretend it is.”
── One standard ──
Most families outside the largest single-family offices settle for an incomplete picture of their private holdings — either the platform doesn't measure them well, or the tool that does is priced and built for a team they don't have. Either way, the two halves of the portfolio don't get compared the same way.
Performance you can only see in one half of the portfolio isn't performance. It's a guess with good formatting.”
── See the platform ──
See your real return, on everything.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
Position-level analysis is the Micro Agent's territory.